Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Sach ka Saamna-Is it really that big a deal????

PS: I write this at the top,defying convention..I AM A HARDCORE PESSIMIST..All the views are kept with this attitude in mind and mostly give only one side.

In a democracy Who decides morality, who decides what is right and wrong?? We might think it is us, the common people who do it via the voting system but do we really??? Its almost as if voting once every 5 years absolves us from the blame of what happens to the country during that tenure.

During Arjun Singh’s tenure when the Reservation bill was passed, in spite of all the furore made and the protests (violent and non-violent),bhook hadtals, peaceful marches and processions only 1 fact came to light – we really could do nothing once they decided to pass it in spite of all the blood spilt and lives lost.

After that the movement just fizzled out-just like that. So much so that when there was a law passed about raising the bar of the creamy layer from 2 lacs to 4.5 lacs many people had no idea and it passed.[YFE had organized an e-petition. I was the 819th person to sign it…and this was 2 months back…a long time after it passed. Also if u have no idea what YFE is..2 words-“Knuckle-Head”]

I digress. (I attribute it to no writing after I got out of school-I’ll save this one for another day).

There’s this show on TV making headlines…Its infamous claim to fame is that it made the news even before it started on the controversy between Vinod Kambli and Sachin Tendulkar. After that all the floodgates opened and I somehow catch it on the news everyday or if not everyday every second day at least.Turn on the news channel and youll see ‘clips’ from the show where the participant wired up to this polygraph thingie and all theyre supposed to do is tell the truth…21 questions will earn you 1 crore Rs. and you walk out a filthy rich man/woman or any other kind(I think they had a couple of the other catergories too but im not really a follower and I really am too lazy to find it out).

Yes..I’m talkin about the infamous ‘Sach ka Saamna’. I used to watch ‘ The Moment of Truth’ and it seems our hindi counterpart is “inspired” from that. (“Inspired” is a lovely word used in the media industry to well,basically copy the entire format- the same sets, the same seat, down to the same color when the buzzer in it rings. They were mightily inspired I tell you :P .At least they didn’t just translate the name of the show.)

The uproar that is being created is because :- It is against “Indian Culture.”

So what does the average Indian do-well, what can he do??? He lays down spread-eagled on the couch, watching,enjoying and savouring every bit of the show and criticizing it as soon as it ends (I somehow ‘know’ many of these people).

Turns out that our watch’dogs’ are there to protect us. Like messiahs they jump to action-ready to take on anyone or anything that is remotely ‘corrupting’ our culture. So the issue is taken to the parliament and is hotly debated upon ( The fact that our valuable money is being used to discuss THIS issue of ‘paramount importance’ over education, poverty, border security, corruption, nuclear armed neighbours ,26/11 and KASAV somehow escaped their minds.)

SP’s Kamal Akhtar first raised the matter in the Rajya Sabha , saying contestants were being asked “obscene questions” about their personal lives in front of their family members. The show was against “Indian culture”

This is where I got confused(PARADOX anyone??)…So just because they were saying the ‘truth’,that is against Indian culture…but wait,that would mean that ‘lying’ is Indian culture??..but wait..That doesn’t make any sense,does it..it is’nt what the ‘father of the nation’ Gandhi said...so maybe he was wrong or the times have changed (Dunno,have they???)…or maybe these guys are wrong(are they??)…Maybe Indian culture has changed and now its ok to lie???(Na,that just sounds weak in my head…what am I thinking???). Please enlighten me..Someone!!!

I happened to catch a debate on the TV about this show where they had a couple of these MP’s and a couple of B-list celebs.

One of these MP’s-I have no idea what his name was but he was giving his views..So this guy, in a crisp white kurta pyjama, kaala tikka on his forehead, seasoned politician I think..somehow the others never got to speak…or even when they did this guy provided the background commentary. It was plain hilarious -basically according to him whatever has happened in the past its ok and allowed (wtf) and deserves to stay there(wtf x 2)..theres no need to bring it up after that and spoil yours or anyone’s future .. And its ok to have committed crimes as long as they were in the past(because you were young and ignorant-his words) but not ok to admit them (WTF-major one)

[Incidentally on being asked whether he had any relationships before his marriage he declined to answer,on being asked further if he had would he have admitted it to his wife if he had,he declined again. Somehow we can’t question his ‘morality’ but he has the right to set morality for Indians and question theirs.]

This show, even though courting controversy has done 1 good thing – exposing India for the hollowed, hypocritical, voyeuristic society paying scant regard to the truth even while maintaining a ‘holier-than-thou’ attitude towards the west .What is remarkable about this show is that it has average people..the middle class…they could be my neighbours,yours, or even the average guy walking on the road or even the guy sitting next to you.

So When did saying the truth become a problem?? Possibly when it exposes the society for what it is.And because people can’t handle it. Shashi Tharoor’s words come to mind “India is not an under-developed country. It is an over-developed country in an advanced state of decay” (somehow that made sense to me,others might disagree)

In a recently filed petition against this show, the Delhi high court said “If you don’t like it,switch your TV off”

I have a New found respect and immense admiration for the Delhi HC for showing so much maturity,after 377 and this-both of which I support. Following is an excrept

“You are asking us to entertain an area which deals with perceptions and opinions. Further, morality yardsticks are to be decided by the government. We cannot decide the issue,” the judges told the counsel for petitioners, former Additional Solicitor General Vikas Singh.

While repeatedly directing the petitioners to take the issue to the legislature and executive, the court was scathing on lawmakers.

“I am not sure whether the show has brought out the truth of many people but it is certain that it has brought out the hypocrisy of various ministers and parliamentarians,” Justice Shah said. ((these judges sure know how to kick ass :P :P)

He made the comment in reference to the repeated flip-flops by MPs over broadcasting bills and endless debates over self-regulation of TV channels in both Houses. “We have seen numerous debates on self-regulation and what not over the broadcasting rules, though leading to nothing,” Justice Shah said.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

There is a term which is used to possibly explain why this show has generated such colossal TRP’s.Its called SchadenFruede and basically it means “largely unanticipated delight in the suffering of another which is cognized as trivial and/or appropriate.”

In layman language it just means that people get delighted in watching other people suffer.The fact is that this show pander to a voyeuristic audience. However, in this case it is not that we, the audience, want to watch contestants admit to doing terrible things, rather we want to watch them destroy their relationships, hurt their close ones, offend their friends, risk their careers—we want to see how far people will go.

In the end a small and possibly the most important point.Our country was based on an ideal derived from 2 words – “Satyamev Jayte”. Somehow we were always told that truth will always prevail. It is at times like these that you really wonder-Have we really lost our way???Have we really taken the path we wanted to???

The answer I believe can be answered by you and you only. My answer is evident.

PS: I’d love to know what you think just to know where the average Indian stands on this.

6 comments:

  1. +1000 to all what u said..really and from the bottom-most deepest part of my heart (if some place like that ever existed).....Absolutely a person who has committed a moral CRIME cant claim of being MORAL.
    Also if the people were so afraid of admitting something they did, why wud they come 2 get their a***s whooped ?? except for the fact that they want the moolah...
    Just have a slight difference of opinion on the one line u used....TO PROVE ONESELF MORALLY SUPERIOR TO THE WEST....well i really think that many people are morally superior than most people in the west...just my opinion tho...

    BTW hoping u wud write about the thing u started the first part with....U ROXXX

    ReplyDelete
  2. well....m here to throw light on the fact that the show is not actually all about obscene questions...rather its about testing ureselves at ure weakness...whether u can win over ure own emotions...which always justify u...
    if it was all about the obscenity...then all the so-called MODERN people...who call themselves OPEN MINDED..cud hav easily won...
    but that never happened....
    i happened to watch the episode....in which an OPEN MINDED aged guy...accepted all his relationships..of whatsoever kind or status...cuz that just dint matter him...but he lost when they asked him a simple question regarding his daughter....and he lost....cuz it hit hard upon his weakness...so the show is about ure life...of which ...ofcourse...relationships are a part..
    As far as the Indian culture is concerned...our culture is about respecting the relations(can be with father,sister,wife...)and whenever anything looks to be offending those relations....it does create a scene......even thogh its just for a while of time....
    And then...."satya mev jayte"....doesnt guide us to be morally wrong and proudly accept it...and boast our truthfulness... ....nope...not at all...its about understanding the truth....which says that humanity is the biggest moral value one can ever have...which means...
    if ure a goood human....u are a true INDIAN...indeed..

    ReplyDelete
  3. well... shama... we all respect all the relations with all our close ones.. and believe me... telling the truth can never be morally wrong... never... accepting even the fiercest of sins is a good step.. and MORALLY correct..

    @genesis: nice work boiii... i agree wid ur point of view.. also the use if the word INSPIRING was awesum... keep up the gud work...

    ReplyDelete
  4. @el diablo...This comparison wid the west was taken directly as an excrept from a statement by a MP,that was wat he was trying to bring out. you do know that i personally feel that most westerners (excluding possibly germany or japan,if u consider them western cuz theyre possibly eastern but developed) arent as intelligent as us. Compared on honesty however,we'd be beaten anyday..and that you do know it yourself.

    @champak thanx

    @ shama : humanity and indianess arent really as closely related as you think.India doesnt really have a really strong humanitarian record.If it was strong would you think that we wud ever have female infanticide,caste system,riots and killin the girl child to this day???
    the fact that open minded person came out with confessions-and after that people start criticizing him saying that hes corrupt and all...that shows narrow mindedness..and the fact that the truth is possibly not welcome.even today.As for Satyamev Jayte..doesnt it mean that the truth will triumph..even over lies...understanding the truth is important but at least youve got to speak it first..
    And i did forget to mention

    IT DOES TAKE BALLS TO SPEAK THE TRUTH...If nothing, respect them for that...

    ReplyDelete
  5. @shama
    First of all people who do not know what SATYAMEV JAYATE is do not deserve to argue for indian-ness
    U wrote it as ""satya mev jayate"". To bring to ur not so kind notice, satyamev is a single word which cannot be split as satya mev unless ofcourse u dont know ur basics. Satyamev = satyam +iv (sandhi vichched)not SATYA MEV..
    Secondly each indian family teaches their kids that if u commit a wrong, the best thing u can do is accept it....it is solely upto youthat whether u want to accept it in public or behind closed doors. Besides the anchor or the producers dont pull anyone out of their comfortable chairs and tell them that "" CHAL AAJ TEREKO SACH BOLNA HI PADEGA "" . It is solely the participants wish if he wants his HOUR of fame and all the money THIS WAY. No one compells anyone to come and answer the anchors question...it is their own sweet wish. Besides as far as morals are concerned, dont the MORALS of the society interfere and stop the person when he is about to commita a VICE ?? Why is it that the people ( including urself) watch the program with suc interest and then criticize it later for being against INDIAN-ness.
    Hell if the program is anti-INDIA or against Indian values...why the hell do u watch it even ??
    Doesnt watching it make even ur holy self AGAINST INDIAN CULTURE ??

    ReplyDelete
  6. @el diablo-first of all..i know "SATYAMEV JAYTE"...i was mistaken there tho and i apologize for that....and thanks for the sandhi vichched...but i have learnt enough hindi as well as sanskrit in my schooling...and i know it all...but agar kisiko bal ki khal nikalna ho to i just cant help....and being an optimist ill say...atleast u got a chance to boost up ure morale.....
    and then about the show....i dint say i m standing against it or for it....i just said that its just not all about obscenity...
    and that i tried to find out y ppl r sayin it to be against our culture...cuz that is what was asked by the author...
    did i say that I find it against our culture???
    i tried to discover the reason...y they are saying it to be against....
    in fact i suppported the show b saying that its not just all about obscenity...
    u seem just not getting my viewpoint...

    ReplyDelete